Wow, harsh comments there. Why don't you instead give us noobs some useful advice on how we should actually be training instead of criticizing Eric's article for lack of scientific evidence and differentiation among different terminologies (which I frankly do not care much for). Your nonconstructive feedback just tells me that these methods of training proposed in this article, although commonly used, are actually quite useless and you don't point the readers to any other forms of training that you think are effective. This is clearly not your job and it's not like you are getting paid to do this, but since you've already shared so much of your thought, why not share some more??? Otherwise you just come off as some sort of anonymous asshole who's hating on Eric because he's been so successful as a climber and a trainer/writer.
Eric and DPM editors,
Here are a few problems with this article:
1) Local Endurance: You need to make clear the difference between local aerobic and local anaerobic endurance. They are totally different things but the way the article is written readers are not going to understand this.
2) Its unfortunate that the very first thing you list as effecting endurance is maximum strength. Yes there is a relationship there but the importance of maximum strength for developing local aerobic and anaerobic is continually over stated in the climbing community, as if the first thing one needs to do to develop endurance is to increase max strength (you can find this exact idea advanced around the web). This is not true, and listing max strength first encourages this long standing misconception. Also note that you use the term "endurance" in this section but don't mention the muscle's ability to utilize aerobic energy production. Apparently "will power" is a more important component of "endurance" then aerobic energy production.
3) Here is the heart of the matter: The recommended workout is low quality at best. In order for a workout to be effective both the duration and the workload need to be controlled, further the work load and duration need to be have a relationship to the climber's current performance level. The kind of workout structure suggested here is common amongst climbers, it's capable of creating a solid pump but merely getting pumped is not effective training. There are many workouts climbers do that deliver a severe pump but that are ineffective for actually improving climbing performance because the durations and workloads are not closely related to those found on actual climbs.
Workouts such as this a waste of time for anyone except a totally untrained noob, for whom doing anything is better than doing nothing, but even such a person will have to step up to real training in the not too distant future.
DPM I sure hope you are not paying Eric to recycle his out of date, unscientific and ineffective methods. You guys can do better, and this kind of writing reflects poorly on a publication that seeks to establish itself as being on the cutting edge.
You must be logged in to post comments. Please login or create an account.